Speaking of words ...
Dec. 5th, 2004 12:25 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
... have you, Gentle Readers (and especially Laura!) - read Jonathon Swift's A Modest Proposal? I've been alluding to the damned thing for years. The other day ... er, <a href="http://www.livejournal.com/users/ed_rex/friends> one of you</a> ... suggested I actually read it.
I did.
It's much shorter than I'd imagined. Terse (in a legalesee kind of way). Dry and subtle - his academic-style descriptions of a suckling one-year old child, properly prepared his hilarious.
Brilliant satire. I'm glad I've been paraphrasing its thesis for years.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 06:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 04:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 04:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 02:14 pm (UTC)Thanks for the link.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-05 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-06 08:09 pm (UTC)Hours and hours of fun!
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-07 10:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-07 10:53 pm (UTC)or they suspect something is up.
Afterwards, we can have an effective discussion on the role of satire, but usually they don't get juvenalian satire unless they're hit over the head with it.
Sometimes though, it's mostly for my own amusement.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 12:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 12:21 am (UTC)Oh shit. That was satire? I always read it as the straight-up ravings of a mad-woman (in both senses of the term).
Oh my. I must re-read that.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 12:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 12:34 am (UTC)I think you have to take something so outrageous as satire. It's just as outrageous as suggesting human beings eat babies, no?
Do you? I hate to risk invoking Hitler during an internet discussion, but his plans for the Final Solution were about as far as you can get from a joke. There are some very sick bastards in this world, and sometimes, they aren't kidding at all.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 12:44 am (UTC)You have a point and I agree. I suppose it depends on how far you take it. Solanas didn't actually attempt to eliminate the male species. I'm not saying that automatically means she wasn't too serious about her suggestions, but it's probably more likely. I just felt a sense of parody while I was reading it. A mocking tone.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 01:03 am (UTC)I wonder if you read it the same way I did, some years ago, a very earnest newsgroup for Greek Orthodox people. The discussions were almost entirely about what were - to me - incredibly arcane disagreements based on two fundamental beliefs - (1) that there is a God; and (2) that the Orthodox are closer to him than anyone else - that to me were non-sensical.
To make a long story short, I wonder if you were reading-in parody where it wasn't intended.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-08 01:49 am (UTC)There is no way to ever know what an author's intentions were unless you ask them directly. And really, it doesn't matter. I am quite sure authors would be rolling in their graves if they saw the way their works were being taught in high school, college or university.
People read things and have different interpretations of the same piece. I found more people in my class read it as a parody than as a real opinion though, including my professor and TA.