The vocabulary of dehumanization
Oct. 21st, 2012 06:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ed_rexShort and to-the-point analysis of media bias, liberal and conservative versions — both meant to defame a former child-soldier and victim of long-term torture.
Originally posted bysabotabby at The vocabulary of dehumanization
Originally posted by
sabotabby at The vocabulary of dehumanization.
Interesting that the Star calls Omar Khadr a war criminal and the SUN calls him a terrorist. Both terms are inaccurate ("child soldier" would be much more appropriate; "torture victim" is also relevant); both are intended to dehumanize this young man to the papers' respective readership and to invoke a sense of fear at the very existence of this psychologically broken individual.
But both papers are very canny about what will arouse that fear-and-dehumanization response amongst their readers. The SUN knows that the worst thing one can be is a terrorist*; the enlightened readers of the Star know that this is just silly fear-mongering. The worst thing that one can be to the common liberal is a war criminal. Just the thought conjures up images of concentration camps and rallies in Nuremberg, obfuscating entirely the act itself: the alleged throwing of a grenade by a 15-year-old brainwashed child at armed men who had voluntarily signed up to get paid to subjugate other countries.
At any rate, I'm rather hoping that Mr. Hallam himself doesn't get too much flak over this, because he sounds like a stand-up fellow and someone I'd get along with. Anyone who takes such a positive interest in the education of young people is fine by me!
* Unless one's terrorism is directed against women exercising their reproductive choices and health care providers who assist them in doing so. That kind of terrorism will get you a medal from the Queen.
Interesting that the Star calls Omar Khadr a war criminal and the SUN calls him a terrorist. Both terms are inaccurate ("child soldier" would be much more appropriate; "torture victim" is also relevant); both are intended to dehumanize this young man to the papers' respective readership and to invoke a sense of fear at the very existence of this psychologically broken individual.
But both papers are very canny about what will arouse that fear-and-dehumanization response amongst their readers. The SUN knows that the worst thing one can be is a terrorist*; the enlightened readers of the Star know that this is just silly fear-mongering. The worst thing that one can be to the common liberal is a war criminal. Just the thought conjures up images of concentration camps and rallies in Nuremberg, obfuscating entirely the act itself: the alleged throwing of a grenade by a 15-year-old brainwashed child at armed men who had voluntarily signed up to get paid to subjugate other countries.
At any rate, I'm rather hoping that Mr. Hallam himself doesn't get too much flak over this, because he sounds like a stand-up fellow and someone I'd get along with. Anyone who takes such a positive interest in the education of young people is fine by me!
* Unless one's terrorism is directed against women exercising their reproductive choices and health care providers who assist them in doing so. That kind of terrorism will get you a medal from the Queen.
(no subject)
Date: 2012-10-22 02:58 am (UTC)Abortion
Bioethics
Contraception
Culture of Life
Editorial
Euthanasia
Faith
Family
Freedom
Homosexuality
Newsbytes
Politics
Population Control
Stem Cells
and suddenly had this horrible feeling. These are sites I run screaming from and never come back to. (And "heroines"? Really? That's such a neutral term for a newspaper article! I refuse to read any further.)
*Not* a newspaper!
Date: 2012-10-22 03:08 am (UTC)Nevertheless, and reading between the lines, it seems clear that those Silver Jubilee medals (given out by the Governor General himself, on behalf of the Queen) have our Dear Leader's radical right fingerprints all over them.
So, not a newspaper, but a propaganda site. And I know
Nevertheless, and reading between the lines, it seems clear that those Silver Jubilee medals (given out by the Governor General himself, on behalf of the Queen) have our Dear Leader's radical right fingerprints all over them.
So, not a newspaper, but a propaganda site. And I <em>know</em> <user="sabottaby"> linked to it ironically. I know Sabs, and she ain't no anti-abortioner, believe me!
Re: *Not* a newspaper!
Date: 2012-10-22 03:12 am (UTC)No no, I know that wasn't to be earnest! I just wanted to say that when I see those 'issues' lined up like that, I know that it's time to run, because it never means anything good, and arguments are invariably hopeless.
Re: *Not* a newspaper!
Date: 2012-10-22 03:16 am (UTC)