Lessons to be learned
Oct. 12th, 2011 05:53 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Adding insult to fatality?
![]() |
I don't actually enjoy speaking ill of the dead, nor do I enjoy blaming the victim.
But sometimes there is an important difference between moral and practical blame.
The death of Ottawa civil servant and avid cyclist Danielle Naçu marks one of those times when it is better to risk hurting feelings than it is to observe the social niceties of soothing grief and anger.
So it is necessary to point out what many cyclists — and others — in Ottawa seem to have missed.
Namely, that if Danielle Naçu had been following two basic rules of safe cycling, she would not have been hit and so she would have almost certainly still been alive today.
For the rules and a bit of a rant, click here.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-10-12 10:22 pm (UTC)I used to be more tolerant, but experience with cyclists has made me the way I am now.
There's no arguing with stupidity
Date: 2011-10-14 11:22 pm (UTC)Raven and I recently rented a car and found ourselves in a nearby Provincial Park with very narrow and curvy roads. Quite a few cyclists, too, but I am happy to say most if not all of them were exercising quite a bit more common sense than those you report seeing.
The on-coming lane in blind curves!?!
Re: There's no arguing with stupidity
Date: 2011-10-15 12:44 am (UTC)Yup. I guess they don't get enough of a rush from coming downhill at a 30 degree angle at 50 miles per hour when the speed limit is 35. They have to court death by car-splat, too.