That harsh?

Date: 2011-07-17 03:10 am (UTC)
ed_rex: (Default)
From: [personal profile] ed_rex
I don't think I was harsh on the Oswald character as on the manner of his release. I didn't, and don't, buy it. And I won't, unless he turns out to have had extraterrestrial help in getting himself sprung without a fight.

What he cited about his sentence being carried out so he is now a 'free man' is actually true - just the likelihood of it happening is astronomical.

It might be true in our context, but you don't need a high-priced legal team to think of a few arguments suggesting that since the rules have changed the law is no longer applicable — at least enough to keep Oswald in the slammer longer than, er, 24 hours or so.

I'm open to the character — indeed, I'm kind of presuming Davies has a good reason for having him — it's the way he's been brought into the story I don't believe.

Also as to the 'baby in ear muffs.' I saw it as a cute play on wearing ear protection in shooting ranges.

I'm starting to think you're mis-reading me rather a lot (or else I am you). What leads you to think I didn't enjoy the baby-at-the-gunfight bit? I thought it was rather well done at the time, though comm ents I've read elsewhere have made me a little less comfortable about it.
(will be screened)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
(will be screened if not on Access List)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org

January 2022

S M T W T F S
      1
2345 678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags