![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![]() |
"Do everything I tell ya, don't ask stupid questions ... and don't wander off." |
You see, I cross-posted my reaction to the latest Doctor Who episode to a Livejournal community, where a goodly-percentage of the folks responding too my opening line, "The girlfriend fell asleep" as all manner of sexist and/or at-least-gender-clueless commentary suggesting that Doctor Who is a boys' thing, as if I didn't know or didn't care, that women like it too.
As a Doctor Who fan community, which had by and large reacted to The Eleventh Hour pretty positively, I had expected people to take issue with my critique of the writing. That I would, instead, have been taken to task for besmirching the geekiness of female fans or worse, of denying their very existence, never once occurred to me.
So far as the writer was concerned, I was talking about my particular girlfriend's individual reaction to a television show about which I am a little abnormally enamoured. That anyone would take what I thought was just a cute hook (though one based in reality — she really did fall asleep) as a general commentary on women and science fiction, or anything remotely like that, never even occurred to me.
But that's mostly what happened.
And I'm reminded of a piece of writerly advice I've come across quite a few times, I think first from Judith Merril: Your favourite line — the one you really love? Take it out! It's almost certainly self-indulgent twaddle!
I don't think I actually apologized to anyone for my words, but I sure as hell spent more time than I wanted to explaining what I meant instead of arguing about what I thought of the episode.
Obviously, only the blandest and most pedestrian of writers will never be misinterpreted, but when a whole raft of people miss your point, you're probably doing something wrong.
Cross-posted from Edifice Rex Online
I knew what you meant
Date: 2010-04-08 04:04 am (UTC)But since I was reading this in your LJ, and I've met you and have been reading your LJ for awhile, I knew you were talking about your specific girlfriend, rather than the generic girlfriend.
Your title "Steven Moffat's debut shows promise but fails the girlfriend test" does make it sound like the more cliche - and excruciatingly common "girls don't get this geek stuff" throwaway line, and had I not had the context necessary to know that you were in fact talking about a specific girlfriend, I would have assumed you were just making an asinine joke.
Re: I knew what you meant
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-08 04:24 am (UTC)Perhaps one of the biggest surprises to come my way was the realization that 95% of the people on my Facebook friend list with Bachelors of English can't understand basic sarcasm when presented in written form. I once posted a status update along the lines of "Mass destruction and death in Haiti today. In more important news: Tiger Woods admits to shagging more blonde women." People went out of their flippin' minds! And the ones freaking out were the people I'd met doing all those university English courses. I thought I'd posted some rather blatant sarcasm and they missed it entirely. I got called some pretty nasty things that day ("pathetic excuse for a human being" was one of them). The whole thing was so horrifyingly stupid that it was hilarious.
Yeah, so not the same thing...but it's close...kind of...
Actually, not quite so frustrated this time around
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-08 07:04 am (UTC)Female scifi fen are used to being treated as though we don't exist -- and the "girlfriend test" is a well-established trope. For example, male critics used to praise Battlestar Galactica by saying "even your girlfriend will like it!" Because obviously women are naturally scared of pew-pew space operas.
(no subject)
From:At least Raven isn't into pretentious art-films about drug addiction
From:Yup
From:Re: Yup
From:(no subject)
Date: 2010-04-08 12:02 pm (UTC)Mea culpa
From:being on alert for self-indulgent twaddle...editorial good practice
Date: 2010-04-09 12:18 am (UTC)Re: being on alert for self-indulgent twaddle...editorial good practice
From: