ed_rex: (Default)
ed_rex ([personal profile] ed_rex) wrote2012-07-09 03:54 pm

Television Review: Girls

Girls gone funny

The older I get, the less patience I have for ideologues of any description, whether of the right or of the left.

No matter what their intentions — whether it is to combat racism or to combat other races — anyone who believes there is but One True Way to do things, or think about things, has the soul of a fascist.

And so, rather than just recommending you rent or otherwise get a-hold of the now-completed first season of Lena Dunham's Girls, I found myself struggling with people who seem to seriously believe that cliquish exclusion and nepotism is worse than the Holocaust.

My essay is a long one, so I'll put it plainly here. I enjoyed Girls an awful lot and eagerly await its second season. Dunham is an excellent young writer and her show is a bloody good professional debut — even if its principals are all privileged white people.

Am I blind to my own privilege as a white guy? As I said, my review is a long one, but I welcome your comments. Also, please note: it is not safe for work! You've been warned. Click here for Privilege and prejudice: The unbearable whiteness of being Lena Dunham.

evilawyer: young black-tailed prairie dog at SF Zoo (Default)

[personal profile] evilawyer 2012-07-11 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Don't know the show (thankfully; I've come to realize I'm too old and cranky to want to waste my time on a show about four young chicklets of any creed or color making their way in the world and find it laughable that everyone elevates every little thing to a Matter of Great Importance), but I agree with your underlying point that sometimes entertainment should just be entertainment.