![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
The World of Pooh, revisited
The best art looks upon the face of change without blinking; the best art acknowledges death.
 |
That's why A.A. Milne's seemingly simple and superficial children's story's, commonly known as Winnie-the-Pooh, brought me to tears when I was very young and why it still does now that I am but one year away from being (forty) six.
That's right, reader, Winnie-the-Pooh makes me cry and I don't care who knows it. Further, it is heartbreaking because it is indeed, about the little deaths each of us face, over and over again, as we grow up. For, like snakes sloughing off a season's skin, to gain a new place in the race of our lives, is to leave the old one behind.
Children's stories or no, A.A. Milne's gentle, loving stories about a small boy and his menagerie of stuffed toys does not shy away from the hard truths of live.
The inscription (at right) is as simple as it is sentimental — and yet as profound as it is cognizant of the unusual boy that was my parents' first child, then making the transition from 12 to 13 years old.
I was a kid who read The Globe and Mail with breakfast and romped with Batman when I came home from school; I was as interested in politics as I was fanatical about the fate of the Montréal Canadiens; a kid whose long-term ambitions were torn between wanting to go into cosmology in one way or another, or into politics with an eye towards becoming Canada's first socialist Prime Minister.
I still built sand-castles in the summer, yet thrilled to CBC Radio's international affairs program, Sunday Morning, "a week in the life of the world." I was growing up, I knew it, but I happily embraced those parts of me that were still childish.
The World of (very young) Geoffrey
 |
| The World of Pooh, pages 306 and 307: words by A.A. Milne, illustration by E.H. Shepard. (Photo: The Phantom Photographer.) |
We were far from rich when I was growing up and going out to a restaurant was a rare treat (even taking home Chinese or a pizza was an uncommon occurrence). But they usually managed it on our birthdays.
My 13th was no exception.
If memory serves, both my mother and my father were present despite the fact they had separated a few years before. We ate at an Italian restaurant, one with linen table-clothes and waiters wearing ties — a fancy place indeed to a 13 year-old Sudbury boy.
I enjoyed a plate of veal parmigiana, with spaghetti and meat-sauce on the side and, no doubt, a chocolate milk-shake.
I don't remember the conversation that went 'round the table, but I do remember when the presents came out after dinner.
And the present I remember unwrapping, unlikely as it may sound, was the very volume whose illustrations accompany this piece.
The book was (and still is) a hard-cover omnibus edition of stories I had loved since before I could remember, stories my mother had read to me and my brother over many nights, again and again. In my mind both books were Winnie-the-Pooh, but by law they were Winnie-the-Pooh (1926) and The House at Pooh Corner (1928). The omnibus was only made things right again.
It was in fact a very good edition. The book today, though yellowed 'round the edges and missing its dust-jacket, is in excellent condition and shows every sign of being around at least another 32 years and probably thrice that without difficulty.
I opened it up and read the inscription with gratitude and pleasure. I was turning 13 and I knew very well that my childhood was slipping away from me. Having a small piece to hold on to forever seemed like a very fine thing to me.
And indeed, over the subsequent years, I read and re-read the book a number of times, probably once every two or three years. Usually on one of those melancholy Sunday afternoons when it's raining non-stop, or feels like it anyway. One of those days one wants to revisit a comfortable place.
Childhoods' ends
Mind you, even those of us who struggle to hold on to our personal chain of being — to feel the link from then to now — inevitably find that links once thought secure rust and break away.
The superhero comic books I once loved just about unreadable to me today1.; Frances Hodgson Burnet's The Secret Garden is smug and really boring and even Kenneth Graham's The Wind in the Willows had lost much of its charm the last time I revisited it, probably nearly a decade ago.
I think it was that latter disappointment that stopped me from opening Pooh again for many years, perhaps because my edition was also illustrated by Sheppard. At any even, I decided that I didn't want to risk learning that the world of Pooh was another world lost to me for good.
Now, it occurs to me that many of you who know the "bear of very little brain" strictly through the execrable bowdlerizations courtesy of Walt Disney Inc. might be wondering just what in the world it is I am going on about. Certainly, it was that belief on my part, and that reality on the part of a friend (the lovely and intelligent woman I am allowed to refer to only as Raven), who indeed knew Pooh only as a Disney image, just one more corporate symbol polluting the childhood's of people the world over.
All right, "polluting" is my word, not hers.
"He's cute!" she said a few weeks back. I grumbled and shoved back my chair, then stalked into my office, shortly thereafter returning with my prized (if long unopened) possession.
"It's a damned sight better than 'cute'!" I thrust the volume at her and, with understandable trepidation, she began to leaf through it.
I think it took her a while to come to appreciate the deceptive simplicity in Shepard's line drawings, or even the later colour illustrations. But she was intrigued enough that she began to read it bits and pieces of it. And I was intrigued (and pleased!) enough by her reaction to begin to read bits and pieces of it myself.
I had no intention of re-reading the entire book. But once I'd read a couple of chapters and found myself laughing out loud at Rabbit's officious pomposity, at Eeyore's morosely self-pitying sarcasm I found myself compelled to return to the begining.
But I think it was this exchange that made the decision final.
Whether he would have thought of anything before he had finished the last sandwich, I don't know, but he had just got to the last but one when there was a crackling in the bracken, and Christopher Robin and Eeyore came strolling along together.
"I shouldn't be surprised if it hailed a good deal tomorrow," Eeyore was saying. "Blizzards and whatnot. Being fine today doesn't Mean Anything. It has no sig — what's that word? Well, it has none of that. It's just a small piece of weather."
"There's Pooh!" said Christopher Robin, who didn't mind much what it did tomorrow, as long as he was out in it. "Hallo, Pooh!"
"It's Christopher Robin!" said Piglet. "He'll know what to do."
They hurried up to him.
"Oh, Christopher Robin," began Pooh.
"And Eeyore," said Eeyore.
"Tigger and Roo are right up the Six Pine Trees, and they can't get down, and —"
"And I was just saying," put in Piglet, "That if only Christopher Robin —"
"And Eeyore —"
"If only you were here, then we could think of something to do."
Christopher Robin looked up at Tigger and Roo, and tried to think of something.
"I though," said Piglet earnestly, "that if Eeyore stood at the bottom of the tree, and if Pooh stood on Eeyore's back, and if I stood on Pooh's shoulders —
"And if Eeyore's back snapped suddenly, then we could all laugh. Ha ha! Amusing in a quiet way," said Eeyore, "but not really helpful."
Well," said Piglet meekly, "I thought —"
"Would it break your back, Eeyore?" asked Pooh, very much surprised.
"That's what would be so interesting, Pooh. Not being quite sure till afterwards."
Over a few days, a chapter or two at a time, I read the book(s) from start to finish, wondering whether Milne's eucatastrophe still held any power over my imagination.
About midway through the second book, I began to feel more confident. Milne hints at the small tragedy to come and I found my eyes watering appropriately.
And yes, when the final revelation comes, when we learn what Christopher Robin does in the mornings and prepare to Say Goodbye, I wept nearly as freely as I had as a child.
The world of Pooh is a small world, but a true one; a child's world, but not a childish one. Death is disguised as change, but it is present — as it should be. And Milne's courage, or good sense (or maybe just good luck) means that his creation will outlast any number of saccharine Disney adaptations. Winnie-the-Pooh will stand the test of time.
So, thank you, mummy and daddy. Thank you for that utterly appropriate gift as I was coming of age. And many happy returns of the day, to me and to all of us still linked to the children we once were.
 |
1. With the notable exception of C.C. Beck's wonderfully whimsical and utterly inimitable Captain Marvel. — Return.
no subject
We listened to "The Chocolate Wars" on audio during a recent trip to Canada and I marveled at the quality of the work qua literature. I then heard an interview with the author in which he explained that he'd written it as he would have written any novel and only when he'd completed it had it been classified as "youth fiction". If you're read any youth fiction recently, the difference is remarkable.
Very much of what is wrong with typical children's books, IMO, is that the authors writes to entertain and patronizes to a specific audience instead of worrying first and foremost about writing a really good book, telling a really interesting story, and letting the chips fall where they may in terms of who is going to ultimately be interested in reading it. Roald Dahl's children's books also stand out in that regard -- beautiful stories that happen to be particularly entertaining for kids.
Very much so
But I digress.
In saying, "The beauty of Milne's work and all goods children's literature is that it doesn't condescend," you hit the nail on the proverbial head. Good children's literature is, of necessity, simplified, but it isn't simple. And I ought to check out Dahl, I think.
Re: Very much so
Re: Very much so
Assuming for The Chocolate Wars that you mean the Robert Cormier books, they still hold up well, in my opinion.
As does "I Am The Cheese", and some other books by him.
no subject
I hope you do!
Re: I hope you do!
This is the problem with the sanitation of stories and fairy tales, the Disneyization I guess- the more children are kept apart from tragedy, big or small in whatever form, the more bland and shallow the world gets and the less able they are to adapt. Bad things happen, it's okay to grieve, even if just over leaving a stuffed animal behind, and kids need to know that. A good children's story will deal with those issues and that's why, I'd think, those good stories are still touching and truthful for adults.
Now I want to go read these again, plus the Velveteen Rabbit which I think falls into the same category.
Re: I hope you do!
It's the Ed Rex birthday special!!
Just wanted to say hi.
Re: It's the Ed Rex birthday special!!
Happy Birthday!
Reading not quite between the lines, that is.
Re: Happy Birthday!
Re: Happy Birthday!
Excellent.
Though I don't think I suggested any actual "get a beer" dates this time round, but rather only agreed that this was still a sound plan with me, so there isn't any immediacy required in replying.
Re: Happy Birthday!
procrastinatingoperating.My project is behind schedule, so I don't want to propose any date until I feel like things are under control again.
I'll drop you a line then.
no subject
I've been meaning to re-read Winnie the Pooh - my mum bought a big hardcover version when my brother and I were little and I don't think I have read it since she read it to us back then. I grabbed it out of the "library" in the basement a couple of weeks ago, so I'm sure I will get to it soon...although I am starting to get more schoolwork now, so perhaps it will be a while yet.
Merci
no subject
There's something autumnal about the Pooh books. I can't quite put it in words.
Also, happy birthday!
'Autumnal' sounds about right
But then, any major phase-change feels like that to me. One can never gain without losing something in exchange.
no subject
I have never read the original, but I think you may have inspired me to go to the source.
The first Disney incarnation of Pooh actually did get me upset as a young child but for all the wrong reasons. I think I was just very empathic to Pooh's predicaments.
Hooray!
It occurs to me that [temporarily forgotten name of your son] might be just the right age to have them read to him. Also, Milne's children's poetry books, When We Were Very Young and Now We Are Six, were big favourites of both my brother and I when we were young — your kids might feel the same way.
As for the Disney incarnations, all I actually remember is Pooh's voice, and a picture book I took out from the library when I was 6 or 7, which greatly offended my because it introduced some non-canonical character called fucking "Gopher".
It's conceivable that was the moment when I gave up on Disney forever.