ed_rex: (Default)
ed_rex ([personal profile] ed_rex) wrote2009-04-15 05:19 pm

(no subject)

Yes, I have full-time internet access again, and yes, I owe you Gentle Readers a personal update, but that will have to wait just a little longer. Meanwhile, the second of this year's Doctor Who specials has aired and, yes, I feel compelled to comment upon it. There may be spoilers ahead.)


From the good, a reminder of the better or,
Thank you for the memories, Russel T. Davies



As Russell T. Davies's reign over the revived version of the iconic British television series, Doctor Who comes to a slow end with this year's four specials, and we fans wait to find out what a new creative director and a new actor in the title role will bring us, the Easter special, "Planet of the Dead," could not help but make me consider just how good Russell's period has been, particularly the heart-breaking second series, whose climax — even after multiple viewings, still makes me weep.

But I get ahead of myself.

"Planet of the Dead" is unlikely to make anybody weep, or even sniffle. During his four-episode swan-song, Davies seems to be quite properly giving us "only" stand-alone episodes (though with hints of the Doctor's "death" to come), old-fashioned Doctor Who adventures and on that level "Planet of the Dead" was a very good episode indeed. After all, with a cat-suited jewel-thief, UNIT, an alien world, rather original, Earth-threatening monsters and a scientist in love, what's not to like?

Riding the #200 London double-decker bus while investigating some sort of wormhole, The Doctor finds himself suddenly transported — along with the bus and all half-dozen of its passengers — to a desert planet with three suns (not one of which see, presumably for budgetary reasons), a dangerous mystery (the fate of the Earth hangs, yet again, in the balance!) and a remarkably well-prepared aristocrat, the Lady Christina de Souza, who plays this episodes companion.

I won't bore (or spoil) you with details. The episode is fast-paced, funny and exciting enough — were I still ten, I would probably have found it thrilling.

Which brings me back to the beginning, and just what a happy gift that second series was. Basically, the emotional depths of the Rose cycle spoiled me, left me expecting the exceptional, rather than appreciating it for the near-miracle combination of children's adventure and heart-breaking romance it was.

All that said, I'm glad Davies is taking his leave; an eternal series like Doctor Who, like the title character himself, needs periodic injections of new blood.

* * *

On an entirely different note, one of you (yes, I mean you, [livejournal.com profile] beable!) said you enjoyed the episode, "except for what seemed to be a spectacular RaceFail..." I'm still waiting for the follow-up since (and at risk of once again making a fool of myself, I don't see it.

beable: (Default)

Better yet ... spinoff!

[personal profile] beable 2009-04-16 01:21 am (UTC)(link)

Ace and Christina would both be about the same age now (given that Ace was a teenager when she was with the Doctor).

Just think, Ace and Christina conquer the world with a flying bus and a injudicious quantity of nitro-9!
sabotabby: raccoon anarchy symbol (TARDIS by mimisoliel)

Re: Better yet ... spinoff!

[personal profile] sabotabby 2009-04-16 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
I would watch the hell out of that show.

Re: Better yet ... spinoff!

[identity profile] ed-rex.livejournal.com 2009-04-16 02:59 am (UTC)(link)
Ace and Christina would both be about the same age now (given that Ace was a teenager when she was with the Doctor).

No way, man! Christina's maybe 25? Ace last showed up in 20 years ago. She's got to be at least 45 now.

[Edit:] But along with [livejournal.com profile] sabotabby, I too would watch the hell out of that show.
Edited 2009-04-16 03:00 (UTC)
beable: (Default)

Re: Better yet ... spinoff!

[personal profile] beable 2009-04-17 02:46 am (UTC)(link)

Ace was there around 1988-1989. She was 16 when she met the Doctor. (The actress was 25, but the character was established as 16).

So she'd be about 35-40. I'd peg Christina as being about 30, though anywhere from 25-35 would be plausible.

Re: Better yet ... spinoff!

[identity profile] ed-rex.livejournal.com 2009-04-17 05:45 pm (UTC)(link)
(The actress was 25, but the character was established as 16).

I'll be damned. I thought the actress really was 16ish. As for Michelle Ryan, wiki says she was born in April 1984, so I win on that one!

But I'd still love to find out what happened to Ace, and wouldn't mind at all if Christina was the vector through which the information came to us.